🔗 Share this article

At first, Trump gave the impression to take a firm stance regarding Ukraine. After issuing statements of "serious repercussions" in August should Vladimir Putin persisted blocking peace negotiations, he finally imposed substantial sanctions on the Russian primary petroleum corporations, Rosneft and Lukoil. This decision substantially affected the Russian leader's ability to finance his aggression in the region.

But, via his newly presented detailed peace plan for the conflict, which was created by US and Russian diplomats lacking Ukraine's or EU involvement, Trump has apparently returned to his pro-Putin stance.

Favoring Aggression

Trump's initiative would effectively benefit Putin for invading Ukraine while placing Ukraine's political freedom in jeopardy. Despite ringing statements that "The nation's autonomy will be affirmed", large portions of the proposal actually undermine that essential autonomy. Seen as a Kremlin dream would certainly be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Reflecting his corporate background, Trump seems to view the Ukrainian conflict as a basic border issue, like giving Putin a part of Ukraine's land will satisfy the president. But, Putin's invasion is not only about dominating a damaged region of deindustrialized area in eastern Ukraine. Instead, it's about the nation's democracy – and Putin's clear desire to eliminate it so it ceases to functions as an enticing example for the Russian citizens of the responsible governance that his growing autocracy withholds them.

Territorial Surrenders

Although keeping in position the presently split regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, Trump's initiative would force Ukraine to surrender the entire Donetsk province. Aside from benefiting the Russian Federation with area that its forces have been failed to seize in exceeding a ten years of warfare, this giveaway would make Ukraine's defensive positions dangerously compromised.

Donetsk is the location of the nation's well-known "stronghold system", the fortified protective structures that represent a key obstacle to invading forces. Trump would have Ukraine surrender these positions, leaving Putin a unobstructed path to the capital in case he later decide to resume the conflict.

Armed Forces Limitations

Additionally, in a move that would facilitate future fighting simpler for Russia, Trump would force Ukraine to cut the numbers of its troops from their present approximately 800,000 troops to a limit of 600,000. Significantly, the plan sets no such limits on Russia's military.

In what appears as a concession to Russia's attempts to characterize the nation's democratically elected leadership as extremists, Trump's proposal states: "Every radical ideology and activities must be rejected and forbidden." Seemingly to emphasize this aspect, it requires that "The nation will hold political contests in this period" of a ceasefire agreement. At the same time, the proposal sets no condition that the Russian leader risk his dictatorship by allowing elections in his own country.

Defense Assurances

To be sure, the proposal makes the Russian Federation promise not to "attack other states" and to "incorporate in law its position of non-aggression towards the EU and the Ukrainian people". But taking into account that the Russian leadership has breached comparable accords in the history – for example the 1994 agreement, in which the Russian government committed to recognize Ukraine's sovereignty in return for surrendering its historical nuclear weapons, and the 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, in which Moscow agreed to a truce and a restoration of occupied land in eastern Ukraine to Ukrainian control – for what reason should we have confidence in Russia now?

For this reason the Ukrainian government has been so determined on international protection assurances. Although the initiative threatens a "strong joint military response" in case the Russian Federation renew its military campaign, and includes that "The nation will receive reliable security guarantees", the details vary from fuzzy to alarming. The initiative would not just deny the nation accession to NATO but also prevent member states from positioning military personnel on the nation's land, thereby preventing the reassurance force, presumptively led by Britain and France, on which Ukraine had been counting to deter Russia from rebuilding his weakened military, rearming, and attacking again.

World Response

A separate side agreement according to sources would provide the nation with a Nato-style defense commitment, in which any subsequent "serious, planned, and ongoing military assault" by the Russian Federation on the country "shall be regarded as an assault threatening the tranquility of the Western nations." This implies a armed reaction. However unlike a capable national defense – the nation's best deterrent against additional Russian aggression – the effectiveness of the parallel accord would hinge on the willingness of alliance members, like Trump, to react through arms to Putin's attacks, an action they have {not