🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.