🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed decision, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to use a redrawn congressional district plan that is projected to include several five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three ruling, handed down on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to lift a district court's injunction that had invalidated the new map in November.

Court's Explanation

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing significant confusion and upsetting the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its ruling.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably grouped voters based on their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to use the maps established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

Through a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She stated that it undermined the work of the district court, pointing out that its ruling was crafted by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a breach of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The ruling comes amid a nationwide fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican hold. Typically, map-drawing happens after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have responded with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

On the other hand, Democratic representatives decried the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

Another top House figure said the court had another time shredded its standing by rubber-stamping a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.