🔗 Share this article

For months, threatening communications continued. At first, allegedly from a former police officer and a former defense officer, later from the authorities. Finally, a local artisan asserts he was ordered to the local precinct and instructed bluntly: keep quiet or face serious consequences.

The leather artisan is one of many resisting a multimillion-dollar redevelopment plan where Dharavi – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – will be razed and modernized by a multinational conglomerate.

"The distinctive community of the slum is like nowhere else in the planet," explains Shaikh. "But the plan aims to eradicate our way of life and prevent our protests."

Opposing Environments

The narrow alleys of this community present a dramatic difference to the soaring skyscrapers and Bollywood penthouses that loom over the neighborhood. Residences are assembled randomly and frequently lacking adequate facilities, informal businesses release harmful emissions and the atmosphere is permeated by the unpleasant stench of uncovered waste channels.

Among some individuals, the vision of a renewed Dharavi into a glistening neighborhood of premium apartments, neat parks, modern retail complexes and residences with multiple bathrooms is an optimistic future come true.

"We lack adequate medical facilities, proper streets or sewage systems and there's nowhere for kids to enjoy," explains A Selvin Nadar, 56, who moved from his home state in the early eighties. "The sole solution is to demolish everything and build us new homes."

Community Resistance

Yet certain residents, such as this protester, are fighting against the plan.

None deny that the slum, consistently overlooked as informal housing, is desperately requiring investment and development. But they fear that this initiative – absent of public consultation – could potentially convert valuable urban land into a luxury development, displacing the disadvantaged, immigrant populations who have been there since the nineteenth century.

This involved these shunned, displaced people who established the uninhabited area into an extensively researched phenomenon of self-reliance and business activity, whose production is valued at between a significant amount and two million dollars per year, making it among the globe's biggest unregulated sectors.

Resettlement Issues

Among approximately 1 million people living in the crowded 220-hectare neighborhood, a minority will be able for new homes in the project, which is estimated to take seven years to accomplish. The remainder will be moved to barren areas and salt plains on the far outskirts of the metropolis, risking break up a long-established neighborhood. A portion will receive no residences at all.

Residents permitted to continue living in the area will be allocated flats in high-rise buildings, a significant rupture from the natural, shared lifestyle of dwelling and laboring that has maintained Dharavi for many years.

Businesses from garment work to ceramic crafts and waste processing are expected to reduce in scale and be moved to a specific "industrial sector" distant from homes.

Existential Threat

In the case of the leather artisan, a craftsman and long-time inhabitant to live in Dharavi, the plan presents a fundamental risk. His makeshift, three-storey facility makes leather coats – sharp blazers, luxury coats, fashionable garments – sold in luxury boutiques in upscale neighborhoods and overseas.

His family resides in the spaces downstairs and laborers and garment workers – migrants from different regions – also sleep on-site, allowing him to sustain operations. Outside the slum, housing costs are frequently tenfold costlier for a single room.

Threats and Warning

Within the official facilities in the vicinity, a conceptual model of the transformation initiative shows an alternative vision for the future. Fashionable inhabitants move around on cycles and electric vehicles, acquiring international baguettes and pastries and enlisting beverages on an outdoor area outside Dharavi Cafe and treat station. This represents a world away from the affordable idli sambar breakfast and budget beverage that maintains the neighborhood.

"This represents no development for residents," explains Shaikh. "It represents a massive land development that will price people out for our community to continue."

Additionally, there exists skepticism of the business conglomerate. Managed by an influential industrialist – one of India's most powerful and a close ally of the government head – the conglomerate has faced accusations of favoritism and ethical concerns, which it rejects.

Although administrative bodies describes it as a partnership, the business group invested nearly a billion dollars for its controlling interest. A case alleging that the initiative was questionably assigned to the corporation is being considered in the top court.

Sustained Harassment

From when they initiated to publicly resist the development, Shaikh and other residents state they have been faced an extended period of coercion and warning – involving phone calls, direct threats and insinuations that opposing the development was equivalent to anti-national sentiment – by individuals they allege work for the developer.

Included in these alleged to have issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c