🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of votes added after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner added half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously backed the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over half. He has 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island with a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. Thus there was some opposition. However overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.